Energy Business Solutions · Refrigeration & HVAC performance analysis

Every refrigeration plant is measurable. Most have never been measured.

EnerBusS instruments commercial and industrial refrigeration, chillers and heat pumps with ten field sensors, closes the energy balance over the compressor, and reports the true COP, capacity and System Efficiency Index of the plant as it runs — then turns the findings into verified kilowatt-hours.

10–30 %typical energy saving from control correction and optimisation of existing plant
±5 %COP measurement uncertainty, method validated by the Swedish national testing institute
< 1 yrpayback of most optimisation measures found — setpoints, control logic, charge, superheat
Log p–h diagram of a measured vapour-compression cycle Saturation dome with the measured cycle: compressor inlet 1, discharge 2, isentropic discharge 2s, liquid before expansion 3 and evaporator inlet 4. 1 p₁ T₁ 2 p₂ T₂ 2s 3 T₃ 4 Q̇cond = ṁ (h₂ − h₃) Q̇evap = ṁ (h₁ − h₄) Ẇel · (1 − f_loss) Tc Te specific enthalpy h [kJ kg⁻¹] log p [bar]

Measured cycle on the log p–h plane. Two pressures, seven temperatures and one active-power reading fix points 1, 2 and 3; the refrigerant mass flow follows from the energy balance over the compressor, and every performance figure follows from that.

The problem

Refrigeration is the largest, least-observed load in food retail and food processing.

Refrigeration accounts for roughly 20 % of global electricity use and 50–60 % of the electricity of a typical supermarket. Yet a plant that holds its product temperature is universally judged "fine", and the only performance indicators most sites possess — a pressure gauge and a bill — cannot separate a good compressor from a worn one, or a floating-head setpoint from one left at factory default. Faults that cost 15–30 % of compressor energy are invisible to the cabinet thermostat and to the service technician's monthly visit.

Reference conditions

COP is not a fixed property of a plant

Coefficient of performance moves 2–5 % for every kelvin of change in condensing or evaporating temperature. A COP quoted without its operating point is not a benchmark; the System Efficiency Index (SEI) is designed precisely to remove that dependence.

Performance drift

Plants degrade between service visits

Fouling, oil logging, refrigerant loss, TXV hunting and control setpoints that "stuck" after a callout each shave efficiency slowly. Time-based maintenance checks pressures and temperatures, rarely efficiency — so the drift is only discovered at failure or never.

Verification

Savings that are not measured are not bankable

Energy-efficiency contracts, ESCO structures and green-financing covenants require an evidenced baseline and a post-optimisation measurement under equivalent ambient conditions. An energy-signature model of the plant (kWh/h versus ambient temperature) is the only defensible way to normalise the two.

Measurement method

The internal method: performance from first principles, without a flow meter.

Conventional field testing of a refrigeration plant needs a refrigerant or secondary-fluid flow measurement that is expensive, intrusive and rarely accurate. The internal method — first developed in Sweden in 1986, validated by the national testing institute (SP, today RISE) and since adopted by more than 50 manufacturers and 400 contractors in over 20 countries — instead uses the compressor itself as the flow meter, by closing the first-law energy balance across it.

Ten measurement points

  • p₁ T₁Pressure and temperature at compressor suction — fixes h₁ and suction-line superheat
  • p₂ T₂Pressure and temperature at compressor discharge — fixes h₂ and the isentropic reference h₂ₛ
  • T₃Liquid temperature before the expansion device — fixes h₃ and subcooling
  • ẆelActive electrical power to the compressor (Class B meter, current transformers ±2 %)
  • T₅ T₆Air or liquid in / out of the condenser — condenser approach and fan performance
  • T₇ T₈Air or liquid in / out of the evaporator — evaporator approach and defrost behaviour
  • T₉ T₁₀Ambient and reference temperatures for the SEI and the energy signature
  • ΔtSampling every 5–10 s on a permanently installed analyser, with online storage and alarms

Energy balance over the compressor

ṁ = Ẇel · (1 − floss) / (h₂ − h₁)   floss ≈ 3–10 % for hermetic / semi-hermetic compressors
Q̇cool = ṁ · (h₁ − h₃)   Q̇heat = ṁ · (h₂ − h₃)
COPcool = Q̇cool / Ẇel   ηis = (h₂ₛ − h₁) · (1 − floss) / (h₂ − h₁)

Enthalpies are evaluated from the refrigerant equation of state at the measured states, including glide-correct handling of zeotropic blends (R404A, R407F, R448A/R449A, R134a, R290, R744 subcritical and transcritical). Because the method depends only on thermodynamic properties and the first law, results are independent of any manufacturer data and are reproducible on any vapour-compression plant.

±5 %COP
±7 %Cooling / heating capacity
±2 %Electrical power input
±3 %Compressor isentropic efficiency
Benchmarking

System Efficiency Index and sub-efficiencies: where the losses are, not just how large.

The SEI is the measured COP divided by the Carnot COP between two agreed reference temperatures — the warm and cold media the plant actually serves, not its own refrigerant temperatures. Because the ideal cycle moves with the operating conditions, SEI is nearly independent of them, which makes plants on different sites, seasons and refrigerants comparable. The same measurement is then decomposed into four sub-efficiencies so that each loss mechanism is assigned to a component and a corrective action.

SEI = ηcycle × ηcompressor × ηcondenser × ηevaporator ·  reference: multi-evaporator air systems → lowest setpoint − 5 K; air condensers → inlet air + 5 K
SEI cool
39 % measured
Cycle η₁
73 % normal
Compressor η₂
66 % below range
Condenser η₄
87 % normal
Evaporator η₄
79 % accepted

Indicative levels: state-of-the-art chillers with flooded evaporators reach SEI 45–55 % at full load; well-adjusted expansion-valve plants 40–50 %; a field-measured supermarket rack with fixed head pressure and hunting capacity control commonly sits at 30–40 %, and an air-cooled chiller left at factory fan-control defaults has been measured at 17 %. Sub-efficiency benchmarks then indicate whether the gap is a refrigerant-cycle loss (superheat, subcooling, pressure drop), a compressor loss (wear, part-load cycling, wrong staging), or a heat-exchanger loss (fouling, fan control, airflow).

Services

From a single-day inspection to portfolio-wide predictive maintenance.

EnerBusS is the exclusive partner in Greece for the analyser platform that implements the internal method, and delivers every service with the same instrumentation, the same thermodynamic engine and the same report structure — so a portfolio owner reads one language across every site.

01 · Onsite performance assessment

Field measurement and diagnosis

A portable analyser is clamped to the plant in 20–30 minutes without stopping it. Within the same visit the engineer has COP, capacity, isentropic efficiency, SEI and sub-efficiencies, and can test setpoint changes live. Deliverable: a diagnostic report with prioritised corrective actions and their estimated annual impact.

02 · Continuous online monitoring

Permanent analyser, 24/7 analytics

A fixed analyser per rack, chiller or heat pump streams to the online platform: hourly energy signature versus ambient, daily performance profiles, compressor duty cycles and alarms on efficiency deviation rather than on temperature alone. Deliverable: monthly performance reports and a verified baseline for savings accounting.

03 · Optimisation programme

Setpoints, control logic, refrigerant, superheat

Floating head pressure with a 5 K approach, minimum condensing limits by season, evaporating temperature and target superheat per rack, compressor staging and rotation, defrost scheduling and liquid-charge correction. Measures are implemented with the site's contractor and verified against the baseline signature.

04 · Predictive maintenance

Condition-based, not calendar-based

Compressor isentropic efficiency, condenser approach and superheat stability are tracked as trends. A falling compressor efficiency, a rising approach or negative superheat is flagged weeks before it becomes a failure, a product loss or an emergency callout — converting maintenance from a cost centre into an asset-protection programme.

05 · Commissioning & retrofit verification

Acceptance testing on evidence

New racks, transcritical CO₂ plants, inverter retrofits, condenser replacements and heat-recovery installations are accepted against measured SEI and capacity, not against a nameplate. Retrofit business cases are settled with before/after measurement under normalised ambient conditions.

06 · Energy studies & compliance

Engineering integration

Results feed directly into building energy studies, ESCO contracts, ISO 50001 energy reviews, F-gas leak-rate evidence and EU-funded efficiency programmes. Delivered by chartered mechanical engineers with a track record in HVAC, hydronic and refrigeration design for public and private buildings.

Evidence base

What the literature and field measurements consistently show.

The savings EnerBusS reports are not a vendor promise; they follow from well-established thermodynamic sensitivities and from decades of published field measurement. The table summarises the effects we exploit most often, with the sources listed at the foot of the page.

MechanismEffectTypical magnitudeHow EnerBusS acts on it
Condensing temperatureCompressor energy per kelvin of condensing-temperature reduction2–4 % / KFloating head pressure with 5 K condenser approach; seasonal minimum-condensing limits; fan-control defaults corrected. Monitored supermarket retrofits report 19–29 % annual compressor savings.Wheeler & Smith (ACEEE); Carbon Trust CTG046; Berglöf (IOR 2021)
Evaporating temperatureCompressor energy per kelvin of evaporating-temperature increase2–4 % / KRaise evaporating setpoint to the highest value that still holds product temperature; correct excessive superheat that forces a lower evaporating pressure.Carbon Trust CTG046; IIR / Danfoss application guidance
Fan / control setpointsCondensing temperature reduced by 10 K after correcting a fan-controller default≈ 30 %Field case, measured by the analyser before and after; no hardware changed.Berglöf, IOR Annual Conference 2021
Optimisation of existing plantRange of measured savings from control correction, charge and superheat adjustment10–30 %Standard programme outcome across supermarkets, industrial refrigeration, chillers and ice rinks; ROI typically under one year because most measures are settings, not equipment.Berglöf (IIR Prague 2011, IOR 2021); COOL-SAVE best-practice guide
Analytics-based commissioningMedian energy savings from fault-detection & diagnostics across a large building portfolio10 %Same principle applied to refrigeration: continuous measurement, deviation alarms, corrective action, persistence tracking. Savings rose to 19 % by year four where the programme was sustained.Kramer et al., LBNL 2019 (5,200 buildings)
Refrigeration share of loadShare of a supermarket's electricity consumed by refrigeration50–60 %Why refrigeration is the first place a retail portfolio should look: a 15 % refrigeration saving is a 7–9 % reduction in the store's entire bill.Maidment et al., IOR 2016; Thanasoulas & Molinari, Energy Reports 2025
Global contextShare of worldwide electricity used by the refrigeration sector≈ 20 %Refrigeration is the largest electricity end-use category in the cold chain; efficiency of existing plant is the cheapest abatement available.IIR Informatory Note 38, 2019
For investors and asset owners

Why measured refrigeration performance is a financial instrument.

For an owner of supermarkets, cold stores, food-processing lines or a data-centre chiller plant, refrigeration is the single largest controllable operating cost and the single largest source of unplanned capital events. A performance-measurement programme converts both into managed, auditable quantities — with a cost structure that is small against the energy it governs.

Operating cost

Savings that are settings, not capex

The majority of the 10–30 % saving found in existing plant is realised by changing condensing and evaporating setpoints, superheat targets, staging logic and fan control. The instrumentation and engineering are the only investment; payback of the programme is typically within the first year at Greek commercial tariffs.

Asset protection

Fewer failures, longer compressor life

Compressor failure on a supermarket rack costs a replacement, an emergency callout and product loss. Trending isentropic efficiency, superheat stability and start frequency detects wear, liquid floodback and short-cycling weeks in advance; the same data ends the practice of running one inverter compressor continuously while fixed-speed units short-cycle.

Verification & financing

Bankable, normalised savings

Every site carries a measured baseline energy signature. Post-optimisation performance is compared at equal ambient temperature, giving verified kWh that satisfy ESCO shared-savings contracts, ISO 50001 reviews, green-loan KPIs and EU efficiency-fund reporting. Refrigerant leak evidence for F-gas compliance is a by-product of the same measurement.

Portfolio scale

One method across every site and refrigerant

Because SEI removes the dependence on operating conditions, an owner can rank fifty stores on one axis, allocate capital to the worst performers first, and hold contractors to a measured acceptance criterion at handover. Transcritical CO₂, HFC racks, glycol chillers and heat pumps are all assessed by the same engine.

Decarbonisation

Scope 1 and Scope 2 in the same programme

Efficiency reduces Scope 2 emissions directly; continuous charge monitoring detects leaks early and cuts the Scope 1 refrigerant emissions that dominate the footprint of HFC plants. Both are reported from measured data rather than estimated factors.

Engineering governance

A single technical counterparty

EnerBusS pairs the measurement platform with chartered mechanical engineers experienced in HVAC, refrigeration and building energy studies, including EU co-funded public projects. Owners get one accountable party for diagnosis, specification, contractor supervision and verification.

Illustrative portfolio model

Payback of a monitoring & optimisation programme

Adjust the inputs to your portfolio. Defaults reflect a mid-size Greek supermarket: two racks, ~150 MWh/yr refrigeration electricity, a conservative 12 % saving.

10
150
0.18
12
4,500
1,200
1,500
—MWh saved per year, portfolio
—net annual benefit (€/yr)
—simple payback (months)
—5-year NPV at 8 % (€)

Cumulative net cash flow, years 0–5, at constant tariff. CO₂ avoided is shown at 0.35 kg CO₂/kWh (approximate Greek grid factor). The model is illustrative: EnerBusS quantifies each site's saving from its own measured baseline before any figure enters a contract.

Where it applies

Any vapour-compression plant, any refrigerant.

The method needs only that the plant compresses a refrigerant. It has been applied from a 3 kW display cabinet condensing unit to multi-megawatt ammonia and CO₂ industrial systems.

Supermarkets & cash & carry

MT and LT racks, transcritical CO₂ boosters, condensing units, heat recovery to DHW and space heating.

Cold stores & logistics

Ammonia and HFC central plants, blast freezers, evaporative condensers, defrost and capacity-control strategy.

Food & beverage processing

Process chillers, glycol loops, dairies, breweries, meat and poultry lines with product-specific kWh per tonne KPIs.

Chillers & heat pumps

Hospitals, hotels, data centres, district and ground-source heat pumps — commissioning, SEI benchmarking and predictive maintenance.

Deliverable

Anatomy of an EnerBusS performance report.

Every report follows the same structure whether it covers one rack or a portfolio, so that findings are comparable between sites and between years. Each figure is generated from measured data on the online platform and every recommendation carries an estimated annual impact.

  1. 1
    Executive summary and energy-saving potentialSEI and sub-efficiency overview per rack with symbol-coded status and estimated annual impact
  2. 2
    System design and layoutCompressor models, condensers, heat recovery, control architecture, flow chart of measurement points
  3. 3
    Energy efficiency and reliabilityDaily energy over the baseline period, statistical power profile and high-energy signature versus ambient temperature
  4. 4
    System and component performanceHourly COP and SEI, daily condensing/evaporating/ambient profiles, refrigerant charge, superheat and subcooling, evaporator, condenser and compressor performance
  5. 5
    Controls and control strategies24-hour compressor capacity per unit, inverter loading, start frequency, staging and rotation
  6. 6
    Component data and settings recommendationsManufacturer performance envelope versus measured operating point; recommended winter/summer setpoints with the computed COP improvement
  7. A
    AppendicesSEI method and reference temperatures, measurement uncertainty, sensor specification
ambient °CkWh/h
Fig. 3.2 Statistical power profile — kWh/h per ambient bin (bars: hours of data)
T cond 36 °C fixedT ambientT evap7 days
Fig. 4.4 Daily system performance — a fixed head pressure exposed against ambient
inverter comp. %fixed-speed comp. on/off24 h
Fig. 5.1 24 h compressor performance — short-cycling of fixed-speed units
36 °C · COP 3.031.8 °C · COP 3.8T cond °CCOP
Fig. 6.3 After applying recommended settings — computed COP gain at the summer point
Start with a measurement

Request a performance assessment.

A first onsite assessment of one rack or chiller takes a single day, does not interrupt operation, and returns a diagnostic report with quantified recommendations. For portfolios, EnerBusS proposes a phased programme: pilot sites, verified savings, then roll-out of permanent monitoring.

References

  1. Berglöf, K. Predictive Maintenance based on Performance Analysis using System Efficiency Index and Sub-Efficiencies is the future. Institute of Refrigeration Annual Conference, 2021.
  2. Berglöf, K. Performance inspections with innovative analysing equipment results in significant energy savings. 23rd IIR International Congress of Refrigeration, Prague, 2011.
  3. Berglöf, K. Experience from energy optimisation in refrigeration and air-conditioning plants. IIR Conference, Slovakia, 2013.
  4. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden. Method and guidelines to establish System Efficiency Index during field measurements on air-conditioning and heat pump systems. Effsys+ project EP18, Swedish Energy Agency, 2014.
  5. Berglöf, K. & Anagnostatos, S. D. The future business opportunity of the service sector is to measure and optimise. Milano, 2017.
  6. Wheeler, G. & Smith, G. Refrigeration Energy Savings with Floating Head Pressure. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Vol. 4, 1988.
  7. Carbon Trust. Refrigeration systems: Guide to key energy saving opportunities (CTG046). London.
  8. Maidment, G., Evans, J., Hammond, E., Foster, A. & Brown, T. Supermarket energy use and greenhouse gas emissions – technology options review. Institute of Refrigeration Annual Conference, 2016.
  9. Thanasoulas, S. & Molinari, M. Advancing energy efficiency and sustainability in supermarkets: a comprehensive analysis of integrated technologies and their impact on energy consumption. Energy Reports 13, 2855–2875, 2025.
  10. Kramer, H., Lin, G., Curtin, C., Crowe, E. & Granderson, J. Building Analytics and Monitoring-Based Commissioning: Industry Practice, Costs, and Savings. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2019.
  11. International Institute of Refrigeration. The Role of Refrigeration in the Global Economy. 38th Informatory Note on Refrigeration Technologies, 2019.
  12. Fricke, B., Sharma, V. & Abdelaziz, O. Supermarket system characteristics and operating faults (ASHRAE RP-1615). Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 2018.
  13. IEA HPT Annex 44. Performance indicators for energy efficient supermarket buildings. Heat Pumping Technologies TCP.
  14. COOL-SAVE project. Best practice guide: energy efficiency in food retail refrigeration. Intelligent Energy Europe.